-GGH (PS) (TEMP) Key, et al v. IndyMac Bank, No. 2:2011cv00650 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/14/2011 ORDERING that the 17 findings and recommendations filed May 13, 2011 are adopted in full. Plaintiffs' 11 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED.(Duong, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GGH (PS) (TEMP) Key, et al v. IndyMac Bank Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES KEY, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 No. CIV S-11-650 GEB GGH (TEMP) PS vs. 13 INDYMAC BANK, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER 15 / 16 Plaintiffs filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United 17 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 18 On May 13, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 which were served on plaintiffs and which contained notice to plaintiffs that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiffs have not filed 21 objections to the findings and recommendations. 22 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 24 ORDERED that: 25 ///// 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 13, 2011 are adopted in full; 2 2. Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary restraining order (dkt. no. 11) is denied. 3 Dated: July 14, 2011 4 5 6 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
