-CKD (PS) Sabetta et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al, No. 2:2011cv00554 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K Delaney on 8/17/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-CKD (PS) Sabetta et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANNE SABETTA, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 No. CIV S-11-554 JAM CKD PS vs. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed June 7, 2011, plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed and thirty days 17 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On July 21, 2011, plaintiffs were granted a 18 fourteen day extension of time to comply with the June 7, 2011 order. That time period has now 19 expired, and plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s 20 order. 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 2 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 3 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: August 17, 2011 5 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 4 9 sabetta.fta 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
