-GGH (PS) Greene v. Southland Transit Inc., No. 2:2011cv00551 - Document 7 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/30/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations 4 are ADOPTED; this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
-GGH (PS) Greene v. Southland Transit Inc. Doc. 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CEDRIC GREENE, 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, CIV-S-11-0551 GEB GGH PS vs. SOUTHLAND TRANSIT, INC., Defendant. ORDER __________________________________/ 16 On March 11, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 17 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 18 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections on 19 March 21, 2011, and they were considered by the district judge. 20 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to 21 which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. 22 Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 23 (1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, 24 the court assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. 25 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 26 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1983). 2 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 3 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, 4 IT IS ORDERED that: 5 6 7 8 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed March 11, 2011, are ADOPTED; and 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: March 30, 2011 9 10 11 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.