-GGH (PC) Young v. Aramark Food Service Provider et al, No. 2:2011cv00505 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/13/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
-GGH (PC) Young v. Aramark Food Service Provider et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLAUDE YOUNG, III, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-11-0505 GEB GGH P vs. 13 ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE 14 PROVIDER, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 17 By order filed October 17, 2011, plaintiff was ordered, within thirty days, to 18 submit documents for service by the United States Marshall and to provide the court with a 19 completed Notice of Submission of Documents. The thirty day period has now expired, and 20 plaintiff has not submitted a completed Notice or the documents, or otherwise responded to the 21 court’s order. 22 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 26 //// Dockets.Justia.com 1 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 2 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 3 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 4 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 5 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 DATED: December 13, 2011 7 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 GGH:rb youn0505.fsc 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2