-GGH (PC) Young v. Aramark Food Service Provider et al, No. 2:2011cv00505 - Document 12 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/8/2011 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING Defendant Aramark; DISMISSING Plaintiff's due process claims against defendants Solano County and Solano County Sheriff's Department. (Michel, G)
Download PDF
-GGH (PC) Young v. Aramark Food Service Provider et al Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLAUDE YOUNG, III, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-11-0505 GEB GGH P vs. 13 ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE 14 PROVIDER, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 22 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendant Aramark is dismissed from this action; and 3 3. Plaintiff’s due process claims against defendants Solano County and the 4 Solano County Sheriff’s Department are dismissed. 5 Dated: December 8, 2011 6 7 8 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2