-JFM (PC) Turner v. Shepherd et al, No. 2:2011cv00451 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 06/24/11 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
-JFM (PC) Turner v. Shepherd et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY R. TURNER, 11 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:11-cv-0451 MCE JFM (PC) vs. 13 DIANE SHEPARD, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed April 20, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis 17 affidavit within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 18 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 19 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or 20 paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action 21 be dismissed without prejudice. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 23 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 24 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 25 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 26 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 2 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 3 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: June 24, 2011. 5 6 7 8 /014;turn0451.fifp 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.