-KJN (PC) Green v. Pfadt et al, No. 2:2011cv00436 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/27/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice; 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-KJN (PC) Green v. Pfadt et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL GREEN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:11-cv-0436 LKK KJN P A. PFADT, et al., 14 15 16 Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed June 8, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 17 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On July 7, 2011, plaintiff’s request for an 18 additional fifteen days in which to file an amended complaint was granted. Thus, plaintiff’s 19 amended complaint was due on or before July 22, 2011. That date has now passed, and plaintiff 20 has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- 25 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 2 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 3 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: July 27, 2011 5 6 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 gree0436.fta 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
