-EFB (PC) Williams v. Gomez et al, No. 2:2011cv00426 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/12/2011 RECOMMENDING that dfts Young, Rocha, Rashid, M. Gomez, Wachter, and Kuppinger be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (PC) Williams v. Gomez et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LONNIE WILLIAMS, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-11-0426 GEB EFB P vs. GOMEZ, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 15, 2011, the court determined that plaintiff’s amended complaint did 18 not state a cognizable claim for relief against defendants Young, Rocha, Rashid, M. Gomez, 19 Wachter, and Kuppinger. The court allowed plaintiff 30 days to submit an amended complaint 20 to attempt to state a cognizable claim against these defendants. On May 2, 2011, plaintiff 21 consented to the dismissal of these defendants without prejudice. 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants Young, Rocha, Rashid, M. Gomez, Wachter, and Kuppinger be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 2 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 3 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 4 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: May 12, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
