-KJN (PS) Grant v. United States of America, et al, No. 2:2011cv00360 - Document 75 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/23/12; The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 15, 2011, are ADOPTED; and Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend his Amended Complaint (Dkt No. 63) is denied. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
-KJN (PS) Grant v. United States of America, et al Doc. 75 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK A. GRANT, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV-S-11-0360-LKK-KJN-PS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 14 15 Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER 16 On November 15, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 17 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 18 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 19 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). 23 24 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 26 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 15, 2011, are 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 ADOPTED; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend his Amended Complaint (Dkt No. 63) is denied. DATED: January 23, 2012. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.