-EFB (PC) Jones v. Toft et al, No. 2:2011cv00192 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/14/11 Recommending that Plaintiff's equal protection claims against defendants Toft and Walker be dismissed without prejudice re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Within fourteen days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with the Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (PC) Jones v. Toft et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY JONES, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 No. CIV S-11-0192 MCE EFB P Defendants. 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS vs. TOFT, et al., / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed March 15, 2011, the court found that plaintiff had stated 18 cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Toft and Blum and informed plaintiff 19 he could proceed against those defendants on the Eighth Amendment claims only or file an 20 amended complaint to attempt to state additional cognizable claims against defendants Toft and 21 Blum for violation of plaintiff’s equal protection rights. The court also informed plaintiff that it 22 would consider plaintiff’s decision to proceed only as to the Eighth Amendment claims against 23 defendants Toft and Blum as consent to the dismissal of his equal protection claims against those 24 defendants. On March 31, 2011, plaintiff returned documents for service against defendants Toft 25 and Blum, electing not to file an amended complaint to attempt to state cognizable equal 26 protection claims against those defendants. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s equal protection claims against defendants Toft and Walker be dismissed without prejudice. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 8 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 9 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: April 14, 2011. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
