United States of America et al v. Jenkins, No. 2:2010mc00019 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/5/2010 ORDERING 8 Petitioners are directed to submit proposed findings and recommendations granting the petition to enforce IRS summons within five court days. Respondent may submit any resp onse to the proposed findings and recommendations within five court days of petitioners' filing. Respondent is directed to appear for the compliance appointment confirmed at hearing as scheduled for 5/27/2010 at 2 PM. at the Fairfield, CA address provided to respondent by Officer Brown. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States of America et al v. Jenkins Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and CLIFFORD BROWN, Revenue Officer, Internal Revenue Service, 12 Petitioners, 13 14 No. MC-S-10-0019 LKK KJM PS vs. STANLEY J. JENKINS, 15 Respondent. 16 ORDER / 17 Petitioners’ request for order to show cause came on for hearing on May 5, 2010. 18 Assistant United States Attorney Yoshinori Himel and Officer Clifford Brown appeared for 19 petitioners. Respondent appeared in propria persona. Upon review of the documents before the 20 court, in light of discussion with counsel for petitioners and the respondent, and good cause 21 appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 22 23 1. Petitioners are directed to submit proposed findings and recommendations granting the petition to enforce IRS summons within five court days. 24 2. Respondent may submit any response to the proposed findings and 25 recommendations within five court days of petitioners’ filing. 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. Respondent is directed to appear for the compliance appointment confirmed at 2 hearing as scheduled for May 27, 2010 at 2 p.m. at the Fairfield, California address provided to 3 respondent by Officer Brown. 4 DATED: May 5, 2010. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
