-JFM (PC) Williams v. Hollows et al, No. 2:2010cv03418 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/18/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-JFM (PC) Williams v. Hollows et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LONNIE WILLIAMS, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:10-cv-3418 MCE JFM (PC) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed August 15, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to pay the appropriate 17 filing fee within twenty-one days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a 18 recommendation that this action be dismissed. That order, initially returned by the postal service, 19 was reserved on plaintiff on August 31, 2011. More than twenty-one days have passed since the 20 date of reservice and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not paid the 21 appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 22 dismissed without prejudice. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 2 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: October 18, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 12 will3418.fifp 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
