-DAD (PC) Gonzales v. Sacramento County Jail, No. 2:2010cv03359 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/18/2012 ORDERING that the 13 findings and recommendations are VACATED; plaintiff's 14 motion for an extension of time is GRANTED; and plaintiff has 60 days to file an amended complaint. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-DAD (PC) Gonzales v. Sacramento County Jail Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS GONZALES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-3359 LKK DAD P vs. SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL, 14 Defendant. 15 ORDER / 16 On November 29, 2011, the court issued findings and recommendations, 17 recommending dismissal of this action due to plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint as 18 directed. In response to the court’s findings and recommendations, plaintiff has filed a motion 19 for an extension of time in which to file his amended complaint. Good cause appearing, the 20 court will vacate its findings and recommendations and grant plaintiff’s motion for an extension 21 of time. 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The court’s November 29, 2011 findings and recommendations are vacated; 24 2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 14) is granted; and 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 3. Plaintiff is granted sixty days from the date of service of this order in which to 2 file an amended complaint. Failure to do so will result in the issuance of findings and 3 recommendations recommending dismissal of this action. 4 DATED: January 18, 2012. 5 6 7 8 9 DAD:md gonz3359.36amc 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
