-EFB (PC) Haines v. Rodriguez, No. 2:2010cv03212 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/31/11 ORDERING that the Clerk randomly assign a United StatesDistrict Judge to this case; RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. Randomly assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
-EFB (PC) Haines v. Rodriguez Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH HAINES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-3212 EFB P vs. JOHN R. RODRIGUEZ, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 14 / 15 On December 22, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had failed to pay the requisite filing 16 17 fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court ordered plaintiff to, 18 within 30 days, either pay the filing fee or submit the application for leave to proceed in forma 19 pauperis, and warned him that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action 20 be dismissed. The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted an 21 22 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to that order. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a United States 23 24 District Judge to this case. 25 //// 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 5 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 6 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 7 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 8 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: January 31, 2011. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.