(PC) Jones v. Sahota et al, No. 2:2010cv03206 - Document 120 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/10/2012 ORDERING the Clerk to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal, who shall abandon any efforts to effect service on defendant Suharto; and RECOMMENDING that defendant Suharto be dismissed from this action without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (cc: USM)(Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Jones v. Sahota et al Doc. 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY A. JONES, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. 10-cv-3206 MCE EFB P SAHOTA, et al., ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 14 / 15 On August 12, 2011, the court determined that service of the February 9, 2011 amended 16 17 complaint was appropriate for defendant Suharto. Plaintiff subsequently filed the documents 18 required to effect service of process and on August 2, 2012, the court directed the United States 19 Marshal to serve defendant Suharto. On August 20, 2012, however, plaintiff filed a proof of 20 service purporting to mail to the court a “motion disregarding action against Suharto.” Dckt. No. 21 110 at 9. Although no such motion was actually filed with the court, it appears that plaintiff no 22 longer wishes to pursue a claim for relief against defendant Suharto. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy 23 24 of this order on the United States Marshal, who shall abandon any efforts to effect service on 25 defendant Suharto. 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Suharto be dismissed from this action without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 5 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 6 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 7 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 8 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 9 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: October 10, 2012. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.