-JFM (PC) Campos v. Salinas et al, No. 2:2010cv02825 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/7/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. Referred to Judge John F. Moulds; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-JFM (PC) Campos v. Salinas et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FREDDIE CAMPOS, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. 2:10-cv-2825 GEB JFM (PC) SALINAS, et al., Defendants. 14 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 15 16 A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by 17 the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which 18 requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. More 19 than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was returned by the postal service and 20 plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for 21 22 plaintiff's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 182(f) and 23 110. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 26 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 2 Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served 3 within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 4 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 5 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 DATED: November 7, 2011. 7 8 9 10 /014;camp2825.33a.sec 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
