-GGH (PC) Stanford v. Hardy, No. 2:2010cv02675 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/3/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice; DIRECTING the clerk to assign a district judge to this case. Assigned and Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
-GGH (PC) Stanford v. Hardy Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRELL CORDARRYL STANFORD, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-2675 GGH P Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS vs. JIM HARDY, / By an order filed October 20, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma 17 pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within twenty-eight days and was cautioned 18 that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty- 19 eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not 20 filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee. Accordingly, IT IS 21 HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is 22 directed to assign a district judge to this case. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 26 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections 2 shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are 3 advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the 4 District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: January 3, 2011 6 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 GGH:035 stan2675.fifp 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.