(PC) Jones v. Ballesteros et al, No. 2:2010cv02661 - Document 52 (E.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/3/13 GRANTING 51 Motion for Extension and the May 20, 2013 findings and recommendations are held in abeyance, to the extent that plaintiff has 30 days to file his opposition to defendants November 30, 2012 motion for summary judgment.(Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jones v. Ballesteros et al Doc. 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JEREMY JONES, Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 12 No. 2:10-cv-2661 KJM EFB P BALLESTEROS, et al., Defendants. 13 ORDER / 14 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 15 16 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 30, 2012, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. 17 Plaintiff was granted several extensions of time in which to file his opposition to the motion. The 18 final extension of time was granted to plaintiff on April 15, 2013. That order warned plaintiff 19 that failure to timely file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be 20 dismissed. Despite that admonition and extensions of more than ninety days, plaintiff failed to 21 file his opposition. Accordingly, on May 20, 2013, the undersigned issued findings and 22 recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure 23 to comply with court orders. In response, plaintiff has now filed another request for an extension 24 of time. Dckt. No. 51. The court will grant plaintiff one final extension of time and hold the 25 May 20, 2013 findings and recommendations in abeyance to allow plaintiff to comply. 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request (Dckt. No. 51) is 2 granted and the May 20, 2013 findings and recommendations are held in abeyance, to the extent 3 that plaintiff has 30 days to file his opposition to defendants’ November 30, 2012 motion for 4 summary judgment. Should plaintiff fail to timely comply, those findings and recommendations 5 recommending dismissal for failure to prosecute will be submitted to the district judge for 6 consideration. 7 Dated: June 3, 2013. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
