(PS) United States of America v. Molen et al, No. 2:2010cv02591 - Document 240 (E.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 9/18/2015. In an 235 Order dated 6/23/2015, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's 229 Findings and Recommendations and granted plaintiff's 200 Motion for Default Judgment. Shor tly thereafter, defendant John Hugh Van Auken filed additional 236 Objections to Findings and Recommendations, and defendant James O. Molen filed three documents: 237 "Reply to United States' Reply to Defendant's Objections" a nd two 238 239 "Affidavit[s] of Truth in support of Objection to Order". The Court has reviewed each of these documents and finds they do NOT affect Magistrate Judge's analysis or Court's 235 Order dated 6/23/2015. That Order shall REMAIN IN EFFECT. Additionally, Court has reviewed defendant James O. Molen's 230 Motion to Correct the Record. Because that Motion is without merit, it is hereby DENIED. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
(PS) United States of America v. Molen et al Doc. 240 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:10-cv-02591-MCE-KJN v. ORDER JAMES O. MOLEN, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 In an Order dated June 23, 2015, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s 18 Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 229) and granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Default 19 Judgment (ECF No. 200). ECF No. 235. Shortly thereafter, Defendant John Hugh Van 20 Auken filed Additional Objections to the Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 236), 21 and Defendant James O. Molen filed three documents: “Reply to United States’ Reply to 22 Defendant’s Objections” (ECF No. 237) and two “Affidavit[s] of Truth in Support of 23 Objection to Order” (ECF Nos. 238, 239). The Court has reviewed each of these 24 documents and finds that they do not affect the Magistrate Judge’s analysis or the 25 Court’s Order dated June 23, 2015 (ECF No. 235). That Order shall remain in effect. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Additionally, the Court has reviewed Defendant James O. Molen’s Motion to 2 Correct the Record (ECF No. 230). Because that Motion is without merit, it is hereby 3 DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: September 18, 2015 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.