-JFM (HC) Rouser v. State of California, No. 2:2010cv02437 - Document 21 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/29/11 ORDERING 19 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; and Petitioner's 17 Motion for Default Judgment is denied. (Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-JFM (HC) Rouser v. State of California Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM ROUSER, 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-2437 MCE JFM (HC) Petitioner, vs. ORDER 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 29, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 22 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 29, 2011 (ECF No. 19) are ADOPTED in full; and 2. Petitioner’s May 18, 2011 motion for default judgment is DENIED. Dated: August 29, 2011 5 6 7 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
