(PS) McCune v. Singh, No. 2:2010cv02207 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 01/04/11 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/28/10 12 are ADOPTED; Defendant's MOTION to STAY and Request for early evaluation conference, filed 9/30/10 10 is DENIED. Defendant shall file an answer within 28 days of the filed date of this order.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) McCune v. Singh Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL McCUNE, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 SATNAM SINGH, Defendant. 14 15 CIV-S-10-2207 FCD GGH PS ORDER __________________________________/ 16 On October 28, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 17 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 18 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 19 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 23 24 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 \\\\\ 26 \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed October 28, 2010, are ADOPTED; 3 2. Defendant’s motion to stay and request for early evaluation conference, filed 4 5 6 September 30, 2010, is denied; 3. Defendant shall file an answer within 28 days of the filed date of this order. DATED: January 4, 2011. 7 8 9 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
