(PC) Solomon v. Negrete et al, No. 2:2010cv02103 - Document 71 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER ADOPTING 55 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/22/2011. Plaintiff's 9/8/2011 41 Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief in form of an Order renewing his pain medication is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Solomon v. Negrete et al Doc. 71 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINCENTE SOLOMON, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. CIV S-10-2103 WBS GGH P vs. J. NEGRETE, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 21, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff 22 was granted an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations and has 23 done so. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 by proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 21, 2011, are adopted in full; 4 and 5 2. Plaintiff’s September 8, 2011 motion for preliminary injunctive relief in the 6 form of an order renewing his pain medication (Docket No. 41) is denied. 7 DATED: December 22, 2011 8 9 10 11 12 13 /solo2103.805 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
