(PC)Knutson v. Jacquez, No. 2:2010cv01970 - Document 9 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/20/2010 ORDERING the clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed withoutprejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections due w/in 21 days. (Yin, K)
Download PDF
(PC)Knutson v. Jacquez Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD KNUTSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-10-1970 DAD P vs. 13 FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By an order filed August 26, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file a complaint that 17 complies with the requirements of the Civil Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and 18 the Local Rules of Practice. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a 19 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. 22 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 25 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- 26 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 2 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 3 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 4 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 5 DATED: October 20, 2010. 6 7 8 9 DAD:9 knut1970.fcompl 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2