(PC) Gipbsin v. Kernan, No. 2:2010cv01840 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/4/2010 ORDERING that the 7 findings and recommendations are VACATED; w/in 30 days pltf to submit a properly completed application to proceed ifp; and the clerk to send pltf an ifp application.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
(PC) Gipbsin v. Kernan Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLARENCE A. GIPBSIN, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1840 LKK DAD P vs. SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 21, 2010, the court issued findings and recommendations, 18 recommending dismissal of this action due to plaintiff’s failure to file an application to proceed 19 in forma pauperis in accordance with the court’s August 26, 2010 order. Plaintiff has filed 20 objections to the findings and recommendations and requests additional time to comply with the 21 court’s order. Good cause appearing, the court will vacate its findings and recommendations and 22 grant plaintiff an additional thirty days to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The court’s October 21, 2010 findings and recommendations are vacated; 25 2. Within thirty days from the date of service this order plaintiff shall submit a 26 properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis; plaintiff is cautioned that failure to 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 comply with this order or seek an extension of time to do so will result in a recommendation that 2 this action be dismissed without prejudice; and 3 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed 4 In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action. 5 DATED: November 4, 2010. 6 7 8 DAD:9 gipb1840.36ifp 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.