-EFB (PC) Herrera v. Gardner et al, No. 2:2010cv01744 - Document 84 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/27/11 ORDERING 80 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; and 46 48 and 60 Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief are denied. (Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-EFB (PC) Herrera v. Gardner et al Doc. 84 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO HERRERA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-10-1744 GEB EFB P GARDNER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On July 27, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 27, 2011, are adopted in full; and 2 2. Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunctive relief, Dckt. Nos. 46, 48, and 60, 3 are denied. 4 Dated: September 27, 2011 5 6 7 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
