-GGH (PC) Willis v. Cassey et al, No. 2:2010cv01631 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/22/11. Defendants Prunity, Haworth, Dunlap, Quarte, Tennison, Bickford and Barker are DISMISSED, and any claim of conspiracy against defendants Johnston and Hayward is dismissed as well.(Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GGH (PC) Willis v. Cassey et al Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCEL WILLIS, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. CIV S-10-1631 KJM GGH P vs. FOLSOM STATE PRISON MEDICAL STAFF, et al., 14 Defendants. 16 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On December 15, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 20 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 26 by proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 15, 2010, are adopted in 3 full; and 4 2. Defendants Prunity, Haworth, Dunlap, Quarte, Tennison, Bickford and Barker 5 are dismissed, and any claim of conspiracy against defendants Johnston and Hayward is 6 dismissed as well. 7 DATED: March 22, 2011. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 /will1631.804 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
