(PC) Hamlet v. CDCR, No. 2:2010cv01629 - Document 5 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/30/10 ORDERING the clerk shall randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this action. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Hamlet v. CDCR Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY HAMLET, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-1629 EFB P vs. CDCR, et al., ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 14 / 15 On July 20, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had failed to file a complaint, and had 16 17 neither paid the filing fee nor filed an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 18 The court ordered plaintiff to, within 30 days, file a complaint and either pay the filing fee or 19 submit the application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and warned him that failure to do 20 so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 30-day period has expired and plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise 21 22 responded to that order.1 23 //// 24 1 25 26 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. 3 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 6 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 7 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 8 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections 9 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. 10 Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 11 Dated: August 30, 2010. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
