-EFB (PC) Green v. Miranda et al, No. 2:2010cv01424 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/9/10 ORDERING that the Clerk randomly assign a district judge to this matter. It is RECOMMENDED that Pltf's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction be denied as moot. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days of service. (Owen, K)

Download PDF
-EFB (PC) Green v. Miranda et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN GREEN, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-10-1424 EFB P R. MIRANDA, et al., ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 14 / 15 16 Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on June 10, 2010. In his complaint 17 and motion for a preliminary injunction, plaintiff states that he has been denied reading glasses 18 and that he has been hindered from writing and conducting legal research. The court ordered 19 defendants to respond. Defendants state that plaintiff has been seen by an optometrist and 20 prescribed bifocals for his astigmatism. Plaintiff’s reply admits that he has received his glasses 21 and that his motion for preliminary injunction is now moot. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk randomly assign a United States 22 23 District Judge to this case; and 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s June 10, 2010 motion for a preliminary injunction be denied as moot. 3 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 4 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days after 5 being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections 6 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections 7 to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the 8 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 9 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 10 Dated: December 9, 2010. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.