(PC) Diaz v. Martel et al, No. 2:2010cv01388 - Document 20 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/29/2012 ADOPTING 16 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING defendants M. Martel and Ram from this action without prejudice. (Michel, G)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Diaz v. Martel et al Doc. 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDOLPH M. DIAZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 vs. ORDER M. MARTEL, et al., Defendants. 16 17 No. 2:10-cv-1388-MCE-KJN-P / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 9, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 22 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 9, 2012 (ECF No. 16), are ADOPTED in full; and 3 4 5 2. Defendants Ram and Martel are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. Dated: February 29, 2012 6 7 8 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
