(PC) Ortiz v. Reynolds et al, No. 2:2010cv01380 - Document 180 (E.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/25/18 ADOPTING the 179 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; and DENYING 171 Motion to enforce the settlement agreement. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Ortiz v. Reynolds et al Doc. 180 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JOSE B. ORTIZ, 13 14 15 No. 2:10-cv-1380-MCE-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER REYNOLDS et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On August 28, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 23 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 24 objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 26 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 27 ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 28, 2018, (ECF No. 179) are 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 ADOPTED in full; and 2. The July 31, 2017 motion to enforce the settlement agreement (ECF No. 171) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 25, 2018 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
