-CMK (PS) Bodge v. Trinity County Sheriff's Department et al, No. 2:2010cv01319 - Document 13 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/29/11 ORDERING that The 9 findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2011, are adopted in full. All defendants, except defendant Grossman, are dismissed with prejudice. This action proceeds against defendant Grossman only on plaintiff's claim that he obtained and executed a search warrant that was not based on probable cause. (Duong, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-CMK (PS) Bodge v. Trinity County Sheriff&#039;s Department et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DEBORAH LENORE BODGE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:10-cv-01319-MCE-CMK v. ORDER TRINITY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action alleging violations of her civil 19 rights. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District 20 of California local rules. 21 On January 27, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 23 within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2011, are adopted in full; 3 2. All defendants, except defendant Grossman, are dismissed with prejudice; and 4 3. This action proceeds against defendant Grossman only on plaintiff’s claim that he 5 6 obtained and executed a search warrant that was not based on probable cause. Dated: March 29, 2011 7 8 9 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
