(PS)Ogg v. Cigna Group Insurance Company et al, No. 2:2010cv01218 - Document 4 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/3/10 recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PS)Ogg v. Cigna Group Insurance Company et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSE OGG, 11 Plaintiff, 12 No. CIV S-10-1218 JAM GGH PS vs. 13 14 CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 17 By order filed September 13, 2010, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and 18 twenty-eight days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court 19 informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now 20 expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s 21 order. 22 Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the 23 reasons given in the September 13, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this 24 action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 2 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 3 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 4 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 5 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 6 DATED: November 3, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 ogg.fta 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.