(PS) Pasechnik v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al, No. 2:2010cv01144 - Document 15 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/28/10 ORDERING the 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED IN FULL and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
(PS) Pasechnik v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YURIY PASECHNIK, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:10-cv-01144-MCE-KJM-PS v. ORDER WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., 15 Defendants. / 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 17 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 18 On September 27, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 21 objections to the findings and recommendations.1 22 ///// 23 24 1 25 26 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 27, 2010 are adopted in full; and 5 2. This action is dismissed with prejudice. 6 Dated: October 28, 2010 7 8 9 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.