(PC) Torres v. Karina et al, No. 2:2010cv00977 - Document 6 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/6/10: Recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
(PC) Torres v. Karina et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL TORRES, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0977 GGH P vs. KARINA, Nurse, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed June 3, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an 17 amended complaint. In the June 3rd order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his 18 complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended 19 complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 For the reasons given in the June 3, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY 21 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. 22 Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 25 fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 26 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and 2 served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 DATED: August 6, 2010 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 GGH:035 8 torr0977.fta 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.