-GGH (SS) Calderaro v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2010cv00911 - Document 14 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/17/11, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Matter referred to Judge Damrell. (Kastilahn, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
-GGH (SS) Calderaro v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIRGINIA CALDERARO, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-0911 FCD GGH P vs. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 15 Defendants. 16 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 17 By order filed February 7, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within 18 fourteen days, why his action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The fourteen day 19 period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s 20 order. 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 25 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 26 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Dockets.Justia.com 1 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 2 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 3 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: March 17, 2011 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 GGH:035 calderaro.fsc 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
