-DAD (PC) Jacob v. Ramirez et al, No. 2:2010cv00692 - Document 22 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/14/11 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations 21 are adopted in full; Defendants motion to dismiss 18 is denied; and Defendants shall answer plaintiff's amended complaint within ten days from the date of this order. (Becknal, R)
Download PDF
-DAD (PC) Jacob v. Ramirez et al Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL C. JACOB, 11 Plaintiff, vs. 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-0692 FCD DAD (PC) M. T. RAMIREZ, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 24, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 24, 2011, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendants’ December 21, 2010 motion to dismiss is denied; and 3 3. Defendants shall answer plaintiff’s amended complaint within ten days from 4 the date of this order. 5 DATED: April 14, 2011. 6 7 8 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2