(PS) Harris v. Homeq Servicing, No. 2:2010cv00483 - Document 18 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/19/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 5 ADOPTED IN FULL; and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Case closed. (Carlos, K)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Harris v. Homeq Servicing Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY K. HARRIS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. HOMEQ SERVICING, 14 Defendant. 15 ORDER / 16 17 No. CIV S:10cv0483-JAM-JFM (PS) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 18 On July 15, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 21 objections to the findings and recommendations. 22 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 24 ORDERED that: 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 15, 2010, are adopted in full; 2 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. 3 Civ. P. 41(b). 4 DATED: August 19, 2010 5 /s/ John A. Mendez U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
