(PC) Jefferson v. Weaver, et al, No. 2:2010cv00340 - Document 27 (E.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: ORDER adopting in full 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/31/11. Plaintiff's claims for destruction of property are dismissed as noncognizable claims under § 1983. Defendant Agguirre is dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim. This action shall proceed against dfts Weaver and Doowly. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
(PC) Jefferson v. Weaver, et al Doc. 27 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAMES L. JEFFERSON 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-00340-MCE CMK-P vs. ORDER J.R. WEAVER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern 18 District of California local rules. 19 On December 30, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 21 objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have 22 been filed. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 30, 2010, are adopted 4 2. Plaintiff’s claims for destruction of property are dismissed as non- 5 cognizable claims under § 1983; 6 3. Defendant Agguirre is dismissed from this action for failure to state a 4. This action shall proceed as against defendants Weaver and Doowly. 3 7 8 9 in full; claim; and Dated: January 31, 2011 10 11 12 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.