(PS) Agard v. Hill et al, No. 2:2010cv00323 - Document 71 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/26/2010. The 8/3/2010 49 Findings and Recommendations are DEEMED an Order and defendants' 6/2/2010 34 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is DENIED as to plaintiff's libel claim and GRANTED as to plaintiff's intentional interference claim. (Marciel, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PS) Agard v. Hill et al Doc. 71 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CUNINA AGARD, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 No. CIV 2:10-cv-0323-JFM (PS) vs. BRETT JUSTIN HILL, JENNILEE HILL, and DOES 1 to 10, 12 Defendants. On October 4, 2010, this matter was reassigned to the undersigned based on the 14 15 ORDER / 13 consent of the parties. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 16 1. The August 3, 2010 findings and recommendations are deemed an order; and 17 2. Defendants’ June 2, 2010 motion for summary judgment is granted in part and 18 denied in part: 19 a. Denied as to plaintiff’s libel claim; 20 b. Granted as to plaintiff’s intentional interference claim. 21 DATED: October 26, 2010. 22 23 24 25 /014.agar0323.msj.supp 26 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
