(PC) Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group et al, No. 2:2010cv00247 - Document 17 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/13/10 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
Download PDF
(PC) Seefeldt v. California Forensic Medical Group et al Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN SCOTT SEEFELDT, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-0247 LKK GGH P vs. CA. FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By an order filed August 17, 2010, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and 17 return to the court, within twenty-eight days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on 18 defendant Kadevari. That twenty-eight day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not 19 responded in any way to the court’s order. 20 21 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States 23 District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 24 fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 25 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 2 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 3 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 DATED: December 13, 2010 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 GGH:035 8 seef0247.dism 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2