(PC) Randall v. Kimura, et al, No. 2:2010cv00052 - Document 56 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/21/11 ADOPTING in full 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Defendant Kimura is DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Meuleman, A)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Randall v. Kimura, et al Doc. 56 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERALD RANDALL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:10-cv-0052 JAM JFM (PC) vs. T. KIMURA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 4, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 4, 2011, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendant Kimura is dismissed from this action without prejudice. See Fed. 4 R. Civ. P. 41(b). 5 DATED: November 21, 2011 6 /s/ John A. Mendez UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
