(PC) Draper v. Rosairo et al, No. 2:2010cv00032 - Document 47 (E.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/30/12 ADOPTING 45 Findings and Recommendations in full, DENYING 37 Motion to dismiss as to plaintiff's eighth amendment excessive force claim against defendant Rosario and GRANTING 37 Motion to Dismiss as to all other claims. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days leave to file an amended complaint. Defendant Rosario is ordered to file an answer to the amended complaint within the time provided by FRCP Rule 12. (Donati, J)
Download PDF
(PC) Draper v. Rosairo et al Doc. 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN CLINT DRAPER, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 vs. D. ROSARIO, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 15 16 No. CIV S-10-0032 KJM EFB P Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 9, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, 25 the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 9, 2012, are adopted in full; 3 2. Defendants’ July 21, 2011 motion to dismiss is DENIED as to plaintiff’s 4 Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against defendant Rosario, but GRANTED as to all 5 other claims; 6 3. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 30 days, curing 7 the deficiencies identified in the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations as to the 8 Fourteenth Amendment claims against Rosario and Fowler and the Eighth Amendment claim 9 against defendant Rallos; this amended complaint should include the Eighth Amendment 10 11 excessive force claim against Rosario, which the court has found states a claim; and 4. Defendant Rosario is ordered to file an answer to the amended complaint 12 within the time provided in Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 13 DATED: March 30, 2012 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2