(PC)Avent v. Cate et al, No. 2:2009cv03482 - Document 28 (E.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/15/11 ORDERING 27 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; 21 Motion for Summary Judgment by defendant Lesane is denied. (Matson, R)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC)Avent v. Cate et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUFUS A. AVENT, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-09-3482 JAM DAD P vs. M. CATE et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On June 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 17, 2011, are adopted in full; 2 2. Defendant Lesane’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 21) is denied 3 DATED: August 15, 2011 4 5 /s/ John A. Mendez 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
