(PC) Ashford v. County of Solano et al, No. 2:2009cv03464 - Document 10 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/12/10 ORDERING that the clerk randomly assign a DJ to this action. RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Objections due within 21 days.(Williams, D)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Ashford v. County of Solano et al Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. ASHFORD, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-09-3464 DAD P vs. COUNTY OF SOLANO, 14 ORDER AND Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed March 5, 2010, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days 17 leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so 18 would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now 19 expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s 20 order. 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 24 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 2 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty- 3 one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written 4 objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s 5 Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the 6 specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 7 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 DATED: April 12, 2010. 9 10 11 12 DAD:sj ashf3464.fta 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
