(PC) Turner v. Douglas et al, No. 2:2009cv03445 - Document 45 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/10/2010 ORDERING that the 36 findings and recommendations filed October 8, 2010, are adopted in full;and For the reasons stated in the September 2, 2010 order, the following claims contained in the amended complaint are dismissed: 1) defendants Jencks, Nurse Lilly, Lisa, Genine, Carolynn and Celly Chan allegedly withheld and obstructed plaintiff's grievances; 2) defendant Jencks allegedly failed to provide plaintiff with a copy of his medical records; 3) defendant Nurse Lilly allegedly prescribed Motrin; 4) during booking, plaintiff allegedly told defendant Tony that he had been in a car accident; and 5) all claims against defendants DeSilva, Owens and Prieto.(Duong, D)
Download PDF
(PC) Turner v. Douglas et al Doc. 45 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY R. TURNER, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. WILLIAM G. DOUGLAS, et al., Defendants. 15 16 No. 2:09-cv-3445 GEB KJN P ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On October 8, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 25 file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 26 proper analysis. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed October 8, 2010, are adopted in full; 3 4 and 2. For the reasons stated in the September 2, 2010 order, the following claims 5 contained in the amended complaint are dismissed: 1) defendants Jencks, Nurse Lilly, Lisa, 6 Genine, Carolynn and Celly Chan allegedly withheld and obstructed plaintiff’s grievances; 2) 7 defendant Jencks allegedly failed to provide plaintiff with a copy of his medical records; 3) 8 defendant Nurse Lilly allegedly prescribed Motrin; 4) during booking, plaintiff allegedly told 9 defendant Tony that he had been in a car accident; and 5) all claims against defendants DeSilva, 10 Owens and Prieto. 11 Dated: November 10, 2010 12 13 14 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2