(PC) Parmer v. CDC et al, No. 2:2009cv03310 - Document 16 (E.D. Cal. 2010)

Court Description: FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/26/10 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed with prejudice re 1 Complaint. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Parmer v. CDC et al Doc. 16 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID EARL PARMER, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. CIV S-09-3310 FCD GGH P vs. J. WALKER, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 By order filed May 10, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file 17 an amended complaint. In the May10th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in 18 his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an 19 amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 For the reasons given in the May 10, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY 21 RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. 22 Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 24 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 25 fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 26 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and 2 served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 3 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. 4 DATED: July 26, 2010 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 6 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 parm3310.fta 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.