(PC) Turner v. California Forensic Medical Group et al, No. 2:2009cv03040 - Document 67 (E.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 6/13/2012 ORDERING that the 66 findings and recommendations filed 5/3/2012, are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 63 motion for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Turner v. California Forensic Medical Group et al Doc. 67 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY R. TURNER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. CIV S-09-3040-GEB-CMK-P vs. ORDER CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On May 3, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 3, 2012, are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a writ of mandamus (Doc. 63) is denied. 5 6 7 and Dated: June 13, 2012 8 9 10 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
