(PC) Turner v. California Forensic Medical Group et al, No. 2:2009cv03040 - Document 130 (E.D. Cal. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/26/2014 ORDERING that the 126 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 88 , 104 and 123 motions for temporary restraining order and injunction are DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY R. TURNER, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:09-cv-3040-GEB-CMK-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District 20 of California local rules. 21 On February 24, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 22 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 23 objections within a specified time. Objections to the findings and recommendations have been 24 filed (Doc. 128). 25 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 26 304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 27 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 28 proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 24, 2014, are adopted in 3 4 5 6 full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motions for temporary restraining order and injunction (Docs.88, 104, 123) are denied. Dated: March 26, 2014 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.