(PC) Mitchell v. Haviland, et al, No. 2:2009cv03012 - Document 206 (E.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER signed by District Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/28/15 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed August 07, 2015, are adopted in full; and Plaintiffs July 23, 2015 motion for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 190 ) is DENIED. (Dillon, M)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Mitchell v. Haviland, et al Doc. 206 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN EDWARD MITCHELL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:09-cv-3012 JAM KJN P v. ORDER J. HAVILAND, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 7, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections 23 to the findings and recommendations. 1 24 //// 25 1 26 27 28 In his objections, plaintiff references his motions for interlocutory order, which were filed after the July 23, 2015 motion for injunctive relief. Plaintiff’s motions for interlocutory order were not addressed in the August 7, 2015 findings and recommendations, but were subsequently addressed by separate findings and recommendations issued on August 18, 2015. Therefore, the court declines to address the objections based on plaintiff’s motions for interlocutory order. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 2 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 3 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 4 analysis. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 07, 2015, are adopted in full; and 7 2. Plaintiff’s July 23, 2015 motion for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 190) is denied. 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2015. /mitc3012.805 __________________________ ROBERT C. JONES 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
