(PC) Jefferson v. Perez et al, No. 2:2009cv03008 - Document 37 (E.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 7/19/2010 ORDERING 27 The findings and recommendations, are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's 19 request for a court order is DENIED. (Reader, L)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
(PC) Jefferson v. Perez et al Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LEROYE JEFFERSON, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. CIV S-09-3008 FCD KJM P AUDREA PEREZ, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On April 28, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 19 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 23 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed April 28, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s request for a court order (docket no. 19) is denied. DATED: July 19, 2010. 5 6 7 _______________________________________ FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
